Home Page   |   Site Map   |   Contact
Path :  www.lphg.ch Ph.D. { Web Version } Chapter 3 3.3 { 3.3.3 } 3.3.3.a
Previous  |  Next
CV
Table of Contents
{ Abstract / Résumé }
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
{ 3.1 }
{ 3.2 }
{ 3.3.1 }
{ 3.3.2 }
Ph.D.  /  { Web Version }  /  Chapter 3  /  3.3  /  { 3.3.3 }  /  3.3.3.a : Source effect (Bandwidth)
MBI
Physics Diploma
Photos
Post-Doc
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Appendix
Other parts
{ 3.4 }
{ 3.5 }
3.6
3.7
3.3.3.b : Source effect (Detuning)

3.3        Calculated FBG spectral and impulse responses

3.3.3       Source effect

The decibel scale representation of the impulse response amplitude depends on the spectrum of the light propagating in the grating. For simulation purpose, a theoretical light source with Gaussian spectral shape is defined, which is determined by its central wavelength and bandwidth. The influence of these parameters in the calculation of the impulse response can be seen as a windowing effect applied to the Fourier transform of the grating spectral response.

a)   Source bandwidth effect

The influence of the source bandwidth is presented in Fig. 3-22. The FBG is homogeneous, 10 mm long with a refractive index modulation amplitude of 2×10-4. The central wavelength of the light source is set to the Bragg wavelength of 1300 nm. The impulse response obtained for a theoretical source with bandwidth of 1, 5, 25 and 125 nm is shown. The impulse response amplitude is inversely proportional to the source bandwidth. This can be explained since for smaller bandwidth sources, the coherence length is larger and then the coherent reflection is higher. The counterpart to higher amplitude is a wider transition region that is observed at the grating input and output. The convolution process with a function of higher coherence length explains this. It is important to notice that this "smoothing" effect does not affect the impulse response amplitude near poles (impulse response position for which the amplitude sharply drops to zero and the phase difference has a p-shift). Moreover, we can observe that the phase difference is not affected by the source bandwidth.

Fig. 3-22 Source bandwidth effect on the complex impulse response amplitude (top) and phase difference (bottom) for a 10 mm homogeneous grating with 2×10-4 refractive index modulation; 125 nm (solid lines), 25 nm (dashed lines), 5 nm (dashed-dotted lines) and 1 nm (dotted lines) source bandwidth have been simulated



Top   |   JavaScript
Path :  www.lphg.ch Ph.D. { Web Version } Chapter 3 3.3 { 3.3.3 } 3.3.3.a
Previous  |  Next